DEMO DATA  ·  North Texas pilot · Stress & Coping unit · 75 dual credit psychology students ← Back to provable.education
Analytics
demo mode ← provable.education
Assignment
Mastery rate
62 of 75 students demonstrated full mastery
Avg exchanges / session
Up from 9.2 in the previous unit
Thinking moments flagged
Moments where reasoning was explicitly articulated
Pre → post quiz gain
vs +9.3 pts for matched control group
Where students excelled
Defining stress response mechanisms in own words
94%
Distinguishing acute vs chronic stress with examples
89%
Connecting coping strategies to real personal scenarios
85%
Explaining physiological stress markers (cortisol, adrenaline)
82%
Where to reteach
Differentiating problem-focused vs emotion-focused coping
41%
Applying Lazarus appraisal theory to novel scenarios
38%
Explaining the HPA axis response sequence in order
57%
Connecting allostatic load to long-term health outcomes
53%
Mastery distribution
Full mastery
62
Developing
7
Not yet
6
Sessions over time
Gate coverage — which concepts stuck
Stress definition
94%
71
Acute vs chronic
89%
67
Fight-or-flight
85%
64
Coping strategies
72%
54
HPA axis sequence
57%
43
Problem vs emotion coping
41%
31
Lazarus appraisal
38%
29
Bloom's level spread — exchanges by level
Engagement vs score — dot size = thinking moments
● Mastered ● Developing ● Not yet
Thinking moments
STU-014 · Stress & Coping — PSY101
Student made an unprompted connection between chronic stress and immune suppression before the gate required it.
"Wait, so if cortisol stays elevated it actually stops your immune system from responding normally? That explains why I always get sick during finals."
May 14 · exchange 7 of 14 · tap to open record
STU-031 · Stress & Coping — PSY101
Student self-corrected a misconception about fight-or-flight without being prompted, demonstrating active reasoning.
"Actually I said that wrong. Fight-or-flight isn't just about physical danger — it's about perceived threat. The brain can't tell the difference between a bear and a presentation."
May 14 · exchange 5 of 11 · tap to open record
STU-007 · Stress & Coping — PSY101
Student extended the concept beyond the material to connect allostatic load to a real-world health disparity example.
"So communities with more chronic stressors like poverty or discrimination would accumulate allostatic load faster? That would show up in health outcomes across a whole population."
May 15 · exchange 9 of 16 · tap to open record
STU-052 · Stress & Coping — PSY101
Student identified a limitation in their own coping strategy classification before being challenged on it.
"I keep saying exercise is problem-focused but actually it doesn't solve the problem, it just changes how I feel about it. So it might be emotion-focused after all."
May 15 · exchange 12 of 18 · tap to open record
STU-023 · Stress & Coping — PSY101
Student applied Lazarus appraisal model to explain why two people can respond differently to the same stressor.
"The primary appraisal is different for each person — whether they see it as a threat or a challenge — and that changes everything downstream including what coping strategy makes sense."
May 16 · exchange 8 of 13 · tap to open record
Student records
Alias Topic Exchanges Moments Outcome Date